This statement is ambiguous. It lacks the specificity of a good research project work. It can be true or false depending on the subject of concern. A false response is dependent on common knowledge and research statistics (Smith, 2005). A positive response is dependent on the assumption that the subject at hand may be male gender oriented. For example, football, politics, technology, etc. the statement has loose-ends in that, it raises questions rather than answers, which in essence does not form the basis of a hypothesis. In reference to the statement a person might ask “about what” “really?” Therefore, it does not narrow down into a specific question.
A good hypothesis should be testable. This hypothesis in particular is generalized and, one has to break into specific and particular subjects of interests. The hypothesis is also not relevant. Its relevance is diluted as one has to understand its deeper meaning before responding. It can elicit an abrupt incorrect response from the respondent due to the known perception that women talk more than men. A hypothesis has to have variables an independent variable and dependent variable so as to compare (Bailey, 1994). This aids to increase and improve on its clarity in terms of its outcome. In the form it is, the hypothesis is not researchable. There are no measurable variable or diverse questions that can be asked to support it. The statement does not help in formulating specific and manageable research questions. It does not give a methodology of designing the research or project.
The statement is not refined. It does not give a clear direction of what subject under test coming out as ineffective. A good hypothesis should be clear-cut and straight to the point such that the response will be factual and not assumptive. The project statement has no study population. It has not further defined the control group under study relative to the other and their lacks relativity whatsoever so, it might bring out poor outcome upon the research. It maximizes the use of bias which will affect response. It is also a subject to self opinion and outside influences. It does not explain the context of the research study. A good hypothesis should capture the summary of the research topic as a way that briefly explains the subject at hand. This hypothesis is too shallow and only elicits curiosity on whether respondent might only refute or accept, rather than if respondent might grasp the significance of it.
In modifying the hypothesis into a manner that will be more successful the statement “men talk too much” has to be changed to “men do not talk too much about shopping as compared to women.” In revising the original statement, hypothesis preferred is the null type of hypothesis that is simple concise and has measurable variables; the subject which is shopping, the study group which are the men and control which are the women.
This hypothesis has taken a clear side as it is directional and precise. It is made in a way that is statistically and analytically verifiable. It is specific in that it narrows down from a general statement to a specific statement. Now the hypothesis has a particular subject that can be investigated and, from it specific research questions relevant to the topic can be formulated (Baron, 2008). It has clearly defined terms in the sense of what kind of questions to ask and what kind of data to look for and get. It is also testable in regard to time as it will not take too long to get the relevant data and analysis.
The modified hypothesis has provided a reasonable explanation for the predicted outcome and expected results. The respondent is guided as this hypothesis is directional as well as descriptive. It is systematic in that it has provided the control group, a subject and a study group for comparison (Hennekens et al. 1987).
To investigate the project, a questionnaire, a set of specific questions that have specific answers that aid in the collection of data is preferred. The questionnaire had questions that set the different variables apart and the subject of investigation. Some of the questions include.
1. What is your sex?
2. Do you like shopping and how often do you go?
3. Do you discuss anything about shopping with your peers?
4. Would you choose shopping as a topic in an open discussion?
5. Would you write an article on shopping?
6. Would you write on a social site that you have gone shopping?
After choosing the sample population, the questionnaires were handed out and filled and the data compiled.
In a sample population of 40 people: 20 men and 20 women, it was found out that
1. 4 out of 20 males like going shopping while 16 out of 20 females enjoy the same.
2. 2 out of 20 males discuss shopping with their peers as compared to 19 out of 20.
3. 1 male responded yes to choosing shopping as a discussion topic compared to 19 females.
4. 7 out of 20 males would write about shopping while 20 out of 20 females would do the same.
5. 1 out of 20 males would write on a social site while 18 out of 20 females would do the same.
Using the collected data, it is clear that males are less likely to talk about the topic of shopping or anything that revolves around it as compared to females. This project has brought a clear result that males do not talk much about shopping as compared to women.
The research method used that is the questionnaire is not always accurate. Some of the respondents may answer the questions superficially. Some respondents may misinterpret their questions and answer their own things. The sample population chosen may have been biased. The population may not have access to the same facilities. The method of data collection can be time consuming which does not, follow the characteristics of a good research method.
In this project, there a couple of things that can be done differently. The sample population can be taken from more than one area, the formulation of more questions and questionnaires and the doing of more research based on the topic.
After evaluation, it was satisfactory as it brought out a clear and concise ant the hypothesis was applicable and testable. It was contextual and satisfied a majority of the attributes considered of a good research project. In doing further research, recommendations would include getting deeper insight or meaning of research topic, narrowing it down to other specific modules and finally, what other research would one carry out using the same project to broaden the information obtained.